Well, I've already been around for a while, but this is something I come across have not: A [partial] agreement between rival Lebanese forces would-be Israeli-Syrian peace negotiations, a possible ceasefire between Gaza and the Negev? These trends are primarily due to a natural movement, the backlash against the Iranian security considerations. The history teaches LICs [low intensive conflicts] like waiting to positively respond to major conflicts. Take the Kurdish conflict as an example, we'll take the disengagement as an example, we take the Intifada II as an example. The American conquest of Iraq did not ensure a collapse of regional planning, but for an exuberant power potential whose impact Although sectarian impulses everywhere increased, but the affected countries fall into traditional policy areas left behind. Internal strife and a general ill will eventually lead to negotiate with the enemy rather than the "friend" to wage war. We show it to us with the Fattah-Hamas conflict. After the attempted coup by Dahlan in the Hamas-zone Gazstreifen latent tried to create the impression that could drive the Fattah, Hamas again. Demonstrations and sectarian outbreaks have been seen as the start signal. Sanded this is not because of the unrealistic view that possibility in Western circles [money against Iran's support], or even an alliance with the Israelis, but solely from the impulse in the guise of the coming war against Iran would rather keep the regional power as the long term to lose. A feat of wars where behind every new village, a new power has to say and act the states rather insubstantial, because they ultimately lose every war. Swedish kings, or marauding French in the 30-year war can sing a song like this. That is, Islamist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah, its key character in this story are aware may be doubted. Nevertheless, they are embedded as factors in any negotiation and any strategic thinking. The return to the Islamic philosophy of a conviction by way of life and not through violence and weapons can not be expected to figures who send their sons reiehenweise in the armed struggle. Nevertheless, this is the step they are giving back to humanity, which has deprived them of lying the American League. This return to a war principle that it does not matter whether a Protestant or Catholic is now, Alawite or Shiite, the main thing is that he adheres to the outright attacks in the Middle East just very late. The question whether this is a konvulsischer outbreak of violence existing vision by all stakeholders, a product of chance or capricious circumstances may be undecided. History is always written to the front and we'll see.
Nevertheless, the conclusion to be: A great day for the Middle East. It is hoped that there are more of them in the near future.
Related: "Israel and Syria have begun indirect peace talks with the Syrians, under the auspices of Turkey," the statement read. "The two sides have declared their intention to conduct the negotiations in good faith and with openness. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment