Miki
Report „Al-Fakhora“ 01/07/09 – Vol. „Miki“ - unedited
1. Exceptional Strategic Advancement +++ „This time, Israeli military commanders are leading from the front, not trying to direct the infantry from television screens. This time, the military has clear plans, in stages, drawn up with a year’s preparation. This time, there is no illusion about winning a war only from the air.“ [1] Especially in the stages I and II of the current war, preparation [+of ethnic skills] and plans, and foremost the integration of the civillian question in combat tactics showed an unpredicted low percentage of civillian casualities. The systems law of the strategical inevitability of civillian casualities is not broken, but its influence was diminished. All structures of IAF and IDF show operational progress in implementing theoretical material. [2] IAF and IDF showed that you can combine successes on the ground with international „laws“.
2. One of the major failures of all stages, with a proportional rise [analytic failure – civillian casualities], is that structures of IAF and IDF were not able to solve the question of an unwilling and unable Hamas regarding the civillians evacuation. Even quite important texts about the Lebanon war [2] hide sometimes behind political themes: „Hide in civillian facilities“. [= Al-Fakhora-case in initial statements of the Army and the propaganda] The truth is that Hezbollah won civillian support in Lebanon not cause of „Multiplier Effects“ in the media, or high casualities under civillians. They won the support with an perfect evacuation, especially in Beirut, and later and still! with a system of assistance. Todays IAF-result [„Israeli aircraft dropped leaflets over the Rafah refugee camp, urging residents to flee because of planned Israeli strikes. The leaflet addressed Rafah residents of a strip of neighborhoods that run parallel to the Egypt border. .. The leaflet included the names of four neighborhoods expected to be hit by the IDF, and instructed locals to immediately leave their homes.“ [3]] of 5000 Rafah citizens beeing „evacuted“ to „temporary emergency centers“ of the UN is no number to disdain. A Hezbollah-style „evacuation“ would bring the possible number up to 20 000. Other combinations: Winter vs Summer, Food-Sanctions since November, destructing UNRWA-capabilities and not bolstering them in front of the war that is „on the table“ -a years's preparation-, besides other problems of combat units [length, drugs, ambition] had to lead into a situation of unnecessary civillian casualities.
3. Al-Fakhora list of violations [Basis: Geneva Convention – Swiss version 08.17.1982]
Hamas violated Art. 37.1 [c], partially Art. 44.3 and Art. 51.7
IDF violated Art. 48.1, Art. 50.3, Art. 51.4, Art. 51.5 and Art. 57.
[Inside – Outside-Question] IDF violated Art. 65 [Warning + Aprropriate time to hide]
Note: Public information and internal and external discussions showed no evidence that can weaken this list of violations. It strongly recommended to install an military-investigation. It is not recommended to follow the demand of UN [international – independent investigation], cause such investigations need years and are fragile -political influence-. It is strongly recommended to create another panel of experts that discuss the influence of the enemies capabilities and willingness to evacuate civillian population.
4. A leadership issue? [Alpher -1] A very popular way in Israel to deal with war-related cases [„mishaps“] is to blame a) the political and b) military leadership. One writer, two examples: „A sovereign government must be able to identify connection between reasons and causes, means and targets - unless it was officially decided to hand over the management of the country to talkback writers.“ +++ „Yet the minimum that we could ask of the official, sane Israel was an expression of deep regret over the death of innocents.“ [4+5] Instead of that, the first two days after the Al-Fakhora-incident show again the demand of a broad political initiative to reconstruct the system of political education in Israel. For years, including several wars and conflict scenarios the political class has „successful“ extracted democratic values. Texts like the Geneva Convention, no matter how hard it is to implement them in any military action, are ultimative achievements of democratic thinking. Nobody and not a single government can guarantee the perfect conversion. But they are a basis to take a rational [and democratic transparent] decision: This is blue and this is white. Reaction of Israelis all over the political spectrum again show a an emotional string of different colours, nobody can be found that takes the responsibility to say: This time its blue. One of the reason for it is the constant feeling that texts like the Geneva Convention are a burden and that any single violation will be multiplied via „foreign“ medias. Another reason is that the political agenda has implemented a special Israeli law that the „war against terror“ is to extract from democratic achievements, mostly based on „possible dangers in the future“ [law of „threat to the existence"]. One can understand a large part of this constant and find the reason in „historic events“ that work in the Israeli soul. But after the military showed a quantum jump in the rigth direction, one has to ask why the rest of Israel seems to take a step into ... the other direction. Emotion – Emotion and even more emotions. Several thousand Israeli citizens in uniform figth their way through Gaza. The rest of Israel figths with the own soul, or the soul of the neighbor. It is strongly recommended to install a panel of experts that analyze the system of political communication. And it is strongly recommended that the EU should demand reforms in that specific part in the future negotiations about a „quasi“-EU-membership-status scheduled for April 2009.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/world/middleeast/07military.html?_r=1
[2] Example: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/parameters/07spring/kreps.htm
[3] http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3652553,00.html
[4] http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3495412,00.html
[5] http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3652275,00.html
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Sunday, July 13, 2008
Foods That Fight Diabetes
U + C-RAK - Edited Version
Rechtsanwaltskammer Nürnberg
Fürther Str. 115
Frau Katja Rätz
90429 Nuremberg
Re: investigation of a complaint against Urman + colleague Lawyers, PO Box 10 03 27 93 003 Regensburg, formerly kuw Legal ibid., + + + version of the events in the criminal compute-light area and statements in formal notices and warnings for the client Magma Film GmbH, Anna 35-39, 45130 Essen.
Dear Mrs. Raetz,
during the preparation for a potential civil conflict with the client of the above law firm I have information on supply, which although for my process of little importance, which will be checked but I think by the competent Bar should. After testing on your part, I ask you for a brief information about your view of the situation and if your approach. Let me emphasize here at the beginning that I will here außsschließlich conspicuous sign and I will be here arguementieren as a non lawyer.
After a name change and restructuring of the firm KuW lawyers, 93 003 Regensburg now occurs to the 01/07/2008, the above law firm representing the owners of rights to suspected violations of copyright of the client on the Internet, mainly so-called p2p file sharing. Today 63 film titles from the client know where copyright violations by the KuW Lawyers have been warned. Typically, a company in charge [Copy Rigth Solutions, Switzerland] found an IP address of alleged violations be reported to the prosecutor food and provided after receipt of personal data and send the firm a warning letter to their respective terminal holder . Neither in a procedure against such violations, even at a fairly advocacy demand management fundamental concerns exist on my part, even if the present and in what follows and further defined practice within the Judgement of the OLG Frankfurt is about nuisance liability law on thin ice.
often react Connection to the owner warning from the levy of a standardized modified cease and desist letter. Often, however, no payment of the warning claimed "lump sum compensation" is paid. To 07.07. Now a letter from the House Urman + colleague turned up the demands that "Fixed local contribution" of 14-day period, whereas no objection.
is legally questionable, however, I think, the content of the letter itself, the modified cease and desist letter does not Schuldeingeständiss, the input is confirmed by the Registry. Nevertheless, the firm refers to the obligation, "the cost our use and the cost of officials appointed by our clients anti-piracy company ... to wear. "This commitment is underpinned by two judgments. Both judgments deal with cases, however, where both a liability has been established by the defendants and was admitted by the defendant. In the second sentence that is mentioned [LG Köln of 18:07:07, AZ 28 O 480/06] was signed by the offender, and rightly Abgemahnt even engage the original cease and desist letter, which is an admission of guilt. In my view, here is a link created that is not present. Between culprits, who have admitted their guilt and accused that is not their fault given should have just know how to distinguish a high-level media law firm at any time.
lawyer Andrew Gerstel writes: "Lawyers are subject to the legal profession of the legal profession. The boundary between permissible and meaningful pressure on the debtor - in contrast to dubious methods - assessing a lawyer knows exactly. There is no danger of jeopardizing the sometimes dubious methods of some collection agency your reputation "
Bundesrechtsanwaltsordung. § 43a basic obligations of the lawyer, (3) A lawyer shall not act in which he practices irrelevant. Irrelevant in particular is a behavior in which it is the conscious dissemination of falsehoods or those disparaging remarks is, to which the other party or the course of the process have given no reason.
pulls Unfortunately, this "deliberate dissemination of falsehoods" by all the activities and also the website of the firm. One of many examples found in the automated warning, section VII "The competent prosecutor handled the matter of criminal law at its own discretion, regardless of civil law from the side. We point out that eludes the actions of the prosecutor our sphere of influence, we also no influence have on the investigation may, for example by withdrawal of a complaint, "The continued active Internet presence KuW Legal expressed much more clearly:". If you have received as a violator a warning letter from us, you can assume the following considerations: our data we obtain due to a criminal complaint with the relevant competent prosecutor of this. There are pending criminal proceedings against you so. "[...] The prosecutor forwarded until an investigation, after examining the initial suspicion. The result was so positive in your case. [...] "The transition Ermittlungs-/Strafverfahrens display from the refund can not be influenced by us. . Whether the prosecutor discontinues the proceedings or a search warrant is requested from the investigating judge at the discretion of its respective Staatsanwa (ä) lts /-in "
These statements are contradicted by a letter from the Prosecutor's food, which reports on the mode:
addition, quotes the manager of the client that the evidence with the prosecutor's food had been clarified and "Accepts" of this action was. In this respect, but it should be to imply that the firm Urman + colleague davon Kentniss hat.
Abrede...
Rechtsanwaltskammer Nürnberg
Fürther Str. 115
Frau Katja Rätz
90429 Nuremberg
Re: investigation of a complaint against Urman + colleague Lawyers, PO Box 10 03 27 93 003 Regensburg, formerly kuw Legal ibid., + + + version of the events in the criminal compute-light area and statements in formal notices and warnings for the client Magma Film GmbH, Anna 35-39, 45130 Essen.
Dear Mrs. Raetz,
during the preparation for a potential civil conflict with the client of the above law firm I have information on supply, which although for my process of little importance, which will be checked but I think by the competent Bar should. After testing on your part, I ask you for a brief information about your view of the situation and if your approach. Let me emphasize here at the beginning that I will here außsschließlich conspicuous sign and I will be here arguementieren as a non lawyer.
After a name change and restructuring of the firm KuW lawyers, 93 003 Regensburg now occurs to the 01/07/2008, the above law firm representing the owners of rights to suspected violations of copyright of the client on the Internet, mainly so-called p2p file sharing. Today 63 film titles from the client know where copyright violations by the KuW Lawyers have been warned. Typically, a company in charge [Copy Rigth Solutions, Switzerland] found an IP address of alleged violations be reported to the prosecutor food and provided after receipt of personal data and send the firm a warning letter to their respective terminal holder . Neither in a procedure against such violations, even at a fairly advocacy demand management fundamental concerns exist on my part, even if the present and in what follows and further defined practice within the Judgement of the OLG Frankfurt is about nuisance liability law on thin ice.
often react Connection to the owner warning from the levy of a standardized modified cease and desist letter. Often, however, no payment of the warning claimed "lump sum compensation" is paid. To 07.07. Now a letter from the House Urman + colleague turned up the demands that "Fixed local contribution" of 14-day period, whereas no objection.
is legally questionable, however, I think, the content of the letter itself, the modified cease and desist letter does not Schuldeingeständiss, the input is confirmed by the Registry. Nevertheless, the firm refers to the obligation, "the cost our use and the cost of officials appointed by our clients anti-piracy company ... to wear. "This commitment is underpinned by two judgments. Both judgments deal with cases, however, where both a liability has been established by the defendants and was admitted by the defendant. In the second sentence that is mentioned [LG Köln of 18:07:07, AZ 28 O 480/06] was signed by the offender, and rightly Abgemahnt even engage the original cease and desist letter, which is an admission of guilt. In my view, here is a link created that is not present. Between culprits, who have admitted their guilt and accused that is not their fault given should have just know how to distinguish a high-level media law firm at any time.
lawyer Andrew Gerstel writes: "Lawyers are subject to the legal profession of the legal profession. The boundary between permissible and meaningful pressure on the debtor - in contrast to dubious methods - assessing a lawyer knows exactly. There is no danger of jeopardizing the sometimes dubious methods of some collection agency your reputation "
Bundesrechtsanwaltsordung. § 43a basic obligations of the lawyer, (3) A lawyer shall not act in which he practices irrelevant. Irrelevant in particular is a behavior in which it is the conscious dissemination of falsehoods or those disparaging remarks is, to which the other party or the course of the process have given no reason.
pulls Unfortunately, this "deliberate dissemination of falsehoods" by all the activities and also the website of the firm. One of many examples found in the automated warning, section VII "The competent prosecutor handled the matter of criminal law at its own discretion, regardless of civil law from the side. We point out that eludes the actions of the prosecutor our sphere of influence, we also no influence have on the investigation may, for example by withdrawal of a complaint, "The continued active Internet presence KuW Legal expressed much more clearly:". If you have received as a violator a warning letter from us, you can assume the following considerations: our data we obtain due to a criminal complaint with the relevant competent prosecutor of this. There are pending criminal proceedings against you so. "[...] The prosecutor forwarded until an investigation, after examining the initial suspicion. The result was so positive in your case. [...] "The transition Ermittlungs-/Strafverfahrens display from the refund can not be influenced by us. . Whether the prosecutor discontinues the proceedings or a search warrant is requested from the investigating judge at the discretion of its respective Staatsanwa (ä) lts /-in "
These statements are contradicted by a letter from the Prosecutor's food, which reports on the mode:
addition, quotes the manager of the client that the evidence with the prosecutor's food had been clarified and "Accepts" of this action was. In this respect, but it should be to imply that the firm Urman + colleague davon Kentniss hat.
Abrede...
Friday, July 11, 2008
Barbell Earrings At Claire's
Comcast
Saul Hansel: F.C.C. Chief Would Bar Comcast From Imposing Web Restrictions
Federal regulators are prepared to take action against sellers of Internet access that want to restrict what their customers can do online. Kevin J. Martin, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, said Friday that Comcast, the nation’s largest cable company, should be sanctioned because it had interfered with the Internet connections of users who were exchanging files with other people. Mr. Martin’s recommendation is a strong push for network neutrality, the idea that Internet access providers like Comcast should not be allowed to favor some uses of their networks over others. The cable and phone companies that provide most of the nation’s Internet service have argued that such rules were not needed. They have said that they should be free to run their networks as they see fit, and that there had been no cases of problems with such discrimination. Comcast’s practice of slowing the use of BitTorrent , a method of trading video, music and software files, provides such a case. The practice was intended to prevent frequent file-swappers from clogging up the company’s network . Under Mr. Martin’s recommendation, which would need to be approved by the full commission, Comcast would not be fined. But it would be forced to change its practices and give the commission more details on what it did in the past. Mr. Martin wants to set a standard that will make it difficult for an Internet provider to discriminate against users based on what they want to do online. [...] Comcast argues that its approach is legitimate, and that the commission does not have the authority to impose any sanctions. “We believe that the network management technique we chose at the time was reasonable,” said Sena Fitzmaurice, a Comcast spokeswoman. She added that Comcast had already said it planned to change its approach to dealing with heavy use. It is developing a system that will slow the Internet connections of people who are moving large amounts of data at busy times.
Ein äußerst interessanter Vorgang. Daneben know all Internet culture flatrate supporters of course the rates of existing tools is the Internet industry are ready to go, or have certainly advanced experimental condition. [Already -AOL-Time Warner is testing a system that would impose significant caps on how much its users could download.] After the all-you-can-eat Internet could generate stable profits, the model is now on the reform, which we actually already have been done. Due to the stagnant economic situation influenced [stagnant advertising, accounts, or even fall away] had the entire industry reporting poor prospects. The great leap of TWX shares in February due up in the Statement: In February, Viacom Chief Executive Philippe Dauman told analysts the economy had no effect on advertising sales at the company's cable networks, Which include VH1, TV Land, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central and others, to that point of the first quarter. [Market Watch] did not take long until the market realized that this statement was nonsense. The second recovery resulted from increases in the rest of the "All You Can Eat". AOL TM allowed himself despite difficult market environment [more competition], the statement "flat year", or "only son bit bad." An air bubble, the faster they flew around the ears. Announced loud-mouthed "Adaptation developments" in a difficult environment set in the management by the above case [all do, but Comcast was able to catch that stupid can be] as an air number: Software used to the limit limit. If now one asks why his telecommunications connection according to the contract works ....
The asking price is given. Even the FCC [not a pope, but Obama could change for our blessing] is relevant. Exploits the weakness of the provider for the flat culture.
PS: "The normative message is that it is wrong to block the Internet," said Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia Law School who is the chairman of Free Press, of advocacy group that filed the complaint about Comcast For Which Mr. Martin is proposing a resolution. "The deeper message he's sending here is that users are sovereign . If two people want to send a file between each other, the carriers are not to get in the way "
Saul Hansel: F.C.C. Chief Would Bar Comcast From Imposing Web Restrictions
Federal regulators are prepared to take action against sellers of Internet access that want to restrict what their customers can do online. Kevin J. Martin, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, said Friday that Comcast, the nation’s largest cable company, should be sanctioned because it had interfered with the Internet connections of users who were exchanging files with other people. Mr. Martin’s recommendation is a strong push for network neutrality, the idea that Internet access providers like Comcast should not be allowed to favor some uses of their networks over others. The cable and phone companies that provide most of the nation’s Internet service have argued that such rules were not needed. They have said that they should be free to run their networks as they see fit, and that there had been no cases of problems with such discrimination. Comcast’s practice of slowing the use of BitTorrent , a method of trading video, music and software files, provides such a case. The practice was intended to prevent frequent file-swappers from clogging up the company’s network . Under Mr. Martin’s recommendation, which would need to be approved by the full commission, Comcast would not be fined. But it would be forced to change its practices and give the commission more details on what it did in the past. Mr. Martin wants to set a standard that will make it difficult for an Internet provider to discriminate against users based on what they want to do online. [...] Comcast argues that its approach is legitimate, and that the commission does not have the authority to impose any sanctions. “We believe that the network management technique we chose at the time was reasonable,” said Sena Fitzmaurice, a Comcast spokeswoman. She added that Comcast had already said it planned to change its approach to dealing with heavy use. It is developing a system that will slow the Internet connections of people who are moving large amounts of data at busy times.
Ein äußerst interessanter Vorgang. Daneben know all Internet culture flatrate supporters of course the rates of existing tools is the Internet industry are ready to go, or have certainly advanced experimental condition. [Already -AOL-Time Warner is testing a system that would impose significant caps on how much its users could download.] After the all-you-can-eat Internet could generate stable profits, the model is now on the reform, which we actually already have been done. Due to the stagnant economic situation influenced [stagnant advertising, accounts, or even fall away] had the entire industry reporting poor prospects. The great leap of TWX shares in February due up in the Statement: In February, Viacom Chief Executive Philippe Dauman told analysts the economy had no effect on advertising sales at the company's cable networks, Which include VH1, TV Land, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central and others, to that point of the first quarter. [Market Watch] did not take long until the market realized that this statement was nonsense. The second recovery resulted from increases in the rest of the "All You Can Eat". AOL TM allowed himself despite difficult market environment [more competition], the statement "flat year", or "only son bit bad." An air bubble, the faster they flew around the ears. Announced loud-mouthed "Adaptation developments" in a difficult environment set in the management by the above case [all do, but Comcast was able to catch that stupid can be] as an air number: Software used to the limit limit. If now one asks why his telecommunications connection according to the contract works ....
The asking price is given. Even the FCC [not a pope, but Obama could change for our blessing] is relevant. Exploits the weakness of the provider for the flat culture.
PS: "The normative message is that it is wrong to block the Internet," said Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia Law School who is the chairman of Free Press, of advocacy group that filed the complaint about Comcast For Which Mr. Martin is proposing a resolution. "The deeper message he's sending here is that users are sovereign . If two people want to send a file between each other, the carriers are not to get in the way "
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)